conformity score
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- North America > United States > Tennessee (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Rotterdam (0.04)
- Europe > Finland > Uusimaa > Helsinki (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Regression (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Croatia > Primorje-Gorski Kotar County > Rijeka (0.04)
- Asia (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > Strength High (0.67)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Education (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Regression (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.85)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.85)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.05)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- (2 more...)
31b3b31a1c2f8a370206f111127c0dbd-Paper.pdf
This frameworkcanaccommodate almost anychoice of conformity scores, and in fact many different implementations have already been proposed to address ourproblem. However,itremains unclear howtoimplement aconcrete method fromthis broad family that can lead to the most informative possible prediction intervals.
- North America > United States > California (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.05)
endfor
The first method, explained in Section A1.4.1, consists of directly calibrating a sequence of nested two-sided intervals, as outlined in Section 3.3. The second method, explained in Section A1.4.2, consists of separately calibrating two sequences of lower and upper one-sided confidence intervals, each adopting the significance level α/2 instead of α. Pu j=l ˆϕj(x)amongthefeasible ones with minimal |u l|, whenever the optimization problem does not have a unique solution. Therefore, we can assume without loss of generality that (1) has a unique solution; if that is not the case, we can break the ties at random by adding a little noise to ˆϕ. For any integer T 1, consider an increasing sequence tτ [0,1], for τ {0,...,T}. A nested sequenceofT intervalsindexedbyτ {0,...,T},whichmaybewrittenintheformof St = ˆLm,α(Xm+1;tτ), ˆUm,α(Xm+1;tτ), for appropriate lower and upper endpoints ˆLm,α(Xm+1;tτ) and ˆUm,α(Xm+1;tτ), respectively, is then constructed from (1) as follows.
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Piedmont > Turin Province > Turin (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Piedmont > Turin Province > Turin (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.28)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Bureau County (0.04)
- Government > Voting & Elections (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (1.00)
- Banking & Finance > Trading (0.68)